Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Estimation of the release profiles of multi-unit dose tablets of theophylline from the release profiles of their components.

M U Uhumwangho , R S Okor

Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutics Technology, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria;

For correspondence:-  M Uhumwangho   Email: mike2003u@yahoo.com   Tel:+234-8052057767

Published: 21 June 2008

Citation: Uhumwangho MU, Okor RS. Estimation of the release profiles of multi-unit dose tablets of theophylline from the release profiles of their components.. Trop J Pharm Res 2008; 7(2):981-986 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v7i2.8

© 2008 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to investigate whether the drug release profile of a multi-unit dose form consisting of fast and slow release components can be predicted from the release profiles of their components by simple summation.
Method: The fast release component consisted of conventional granules of theophylline made by wet massing the drug powder with starch mucilage (20%w/v). The slow release component consisted of matrix granules of the drug made by triturating the drug powder with melted carnuba wax (i.e. melt granulation). Each type of granules was compressed to tablets of weight 100, 150 or 200mg. To form the multi-unit dosage tablets of drug content 300mg each, the conventional and matrix granules were mixed in the ratio 1:2, 1:1 and 2:1, and compressed. The tablets were subjected to dissolution test and from the experimental release curve the prompt release (mp) in the first 1h, the maximum release (m) and the time to attain it (t) were obtained.
Result: For a given composition of the multi-unit dose tablets, the theoretical release curve was obtained by summation of the release from each component at the different time intervals. The mp values of the theoretically estimated release curves were generally higher, while their t values were generally shorter than the corresponding values for the experimental curves.
Conclusion: The indication is that drug release from the multi-unit dose tablets was more retarded than could be theoretically estimated. Apparently, the two components interfere with each other’s release.
 

Keywords: single-unit and multi-unit dose forms, release profiles, theophylline

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates